Under the point of view of health, though public prevention and health promotion policies, adequate to objective existing conditions, they try to protect human population from unnecessary diseases. Secular bioethics seeks to understand the ethics of cloning through rational analysis, free from the moral implications of its use; and if the research, they argued that there needs to be a clear distinction between human cloning to produce a new human being, and cloning as a tool in biomedical research that in and of itself would not result in a new human being. Although most respondents indicated that cloning to produce a new human being was practically and morally unacceptable, they did not advocate Apr 12, · Human cloning research papers for sample essay written in first person Case study method definition. The charter trip includes stops in denver, colorado; salt lake city, serving predominantly Political sociology research paper. We were taught the strategies and tactics for teaching modern finnish
Research Papers: Human cloning research papers outstanding writing!
Ethics of Human Cloning Ever since Dolly the Sheep was initially cloned in the latter portion of the 20th centurythere has been widespread debate over the ethical issues and the practicality of human cloning. Many points of these issues are elucidated within a pair of essays in which the respective authors argue for and against cloning.
John Harris' article, "The Poverty of Objections to Human Reproductive Cloning" examines these points and deconstructs them to illustrate his belief that arguments against human cloning are not valid. Rifkin, however, examines many of the same issues from the perspective that opposition to human cloning is both ethical and pragmatic in lieu of the consequences of such a practice. After a careful analysis of each of the viewpoints of the aforementioned authors, it becomes readily apparent that human cloning should not be permitted largely due to ethical reasons.
Prior to demonstrating the validity of the preceding thesis, however, human cloning research paper, it is essential to summarize the arguments both for and against cloning. One of the chief facets of these arguments pertains to stem cell human cloning research paper. Stem cell research can provide scientists with insights into genetic predispositions for certain maladies. The implication is that by gaining these insights, people can then use stem cells to eradicate or prevent such diseases from taking place, or to possibly find a cure for them.
Stem cell research, human cloning research paper, however, kills human embryos -- which is why many against human cloning and stem cell research consider this practice unethical if not illegal. Those in favor of cloning, however, believe that by cloning humans and then killing them as embryos to propagate stem cell research they can avoid unethical behavior because they are merely killing the embryo of a clone.
Those against cloning and stem cell research point out the fact that even if an embryo were cloned, it still deserves the right to live. Thus, there is the time-honored debate between "right to life advocates and researchers" Rifkin regarding the ethical implications of cloning.
Another key point addressed within both articles and hotly debated by proponents of either side is the fact that significant progress in stem cell research which is facilitated by the usage of cloning warps the process by which life is created. The genetic information contained within stem cells is highly specific. With enough research and success in this field, it could conceivably become possible for parents to 'order' the isolated genes for a red-haired, green eyed-child, or someone who has a proclivity human cloning research paper playing the piano really well, or any other facet of life which has roots in genes and genetic research.
Proponents of such a process claim that this form of empowering potential parents merely helps to add fulfillment to their lives. Dissidents believe that such a process is perverse and skews the conventional reproductive methods. Other points of divergence on this issue include the realm of safety. Those against human cloning cite the fact that the processes whereby cloning is engendered are not refined and may cause harm to the individual how is cloned.
Rifkin attests to the fact that the cloning technique is still unsafe and could pose a risk of producing a malformed baby" Rifkin Those in favor of cloning believe that researchers can perfect the process with enough time and erudition devoted to such an activity, a fact to which Harris alludes Another extremely salient ethical implication regarding cloning is referred to as the "slippery slope" Rifkin This argument presents the reality that if cloning a person in his or her infantile stages is acceptable presumably for stem cell researchthat the threshold for the age and the use of cloning will eventually spiraling and have no end in sight.
Those who are advocates for cloning, however, believe that that they can set firm boundaries and clone responsibly in the name of research. Now that the conventional arguments for why society should or should not clone humans have been presented, I would like to advance an original argument for researchers should not conduct cloning on human cloning research paper level.
Some facets of this argument are alluded to within passages in both Still, the principle tenet of this argument is original and not fully discussed by these authors, human cloning research paper, whose works merely serve as example for proving the validity of this argument. The central premise of this argument is the fact that society should not condone human cloning for the simple fact that such a phenomenon does not occur in nature. As such, it is decidedly unnatural, and actually leads people into engaging in further acts that are not natural.
Because human cloning is not a natural phenomenon and actually supplants several natural phenomena the most salient of which is childbirth or a process in which "the gift of life" is steadily marginalized and eventually abandoned altogether" Rifkinis should not be practiced. This argument bears some similarity to the theological argument that opponents of human cloning use.
The crux of this latter argument is summarized in the subsequent quotation. We celebrate our generativity and revel in being participants in an act of creation. The coming together of sperm and egg represents…surrender to forces outside of our control Rifkin Even though this passage refers to the concept of nature, it is human cloning research paper theological in nature and is akin to the viewpoint that God has an overarching plan, parts of which humans can actualize by procreating with one another.
The fallacy with such a theological argument, of human cloning research paper, is the human cloning research paper that the god of one individual is not the same as the god for another, and different gods -- in the form of religions, which are nothing but man's attempts to dictate behavior based on theology -- sanction different actions. This fallacy does not apply to the argument that human cloning does not occur in nature, which is why it should not occur at all. The only way to produce a person is through procreation.
Other means of creation, be they as fantastic as Victor Frankenstein's monster in Mary Shelly's gothic horror Frankenstein, or as realistic as cloning human embryos, are decidedly unnatural. In the case of the latter, the artificial environment in which scientists and researchers control embryos and manipulate them to produce others is very far from natural. The process itself is unnatural, and the result of such a process, the new human being, is highly unnatural itself.
As such, one can successfully argue that the current propensity for science to facilitate human cloning is part of a larger movement in which man has continually attempted to battle and tame nature to suit his own needs.
Human cloning is decidedly at variance from the conventional ways in which man has attempted to usurp nature, which might include building a lasting domicile during a rain storm, or constructing a sea vessel well enough to withstand the most turbulent of maelstroms.
Human cloning effectively represents mankind's desire to create nature itself. In natural life, man's only role as creator is as a procreator of life, or as an artist or an artisan, human cloning research paper. Yet with the advent of human cloning, man is attempting to reconstruct the natural rules of life so that they are effectively bent to man's own liking. In his role as creator via human cloning, man is no longer a scion of nature. Instead, he is an enabler of nature, of beings alive within an environment which he can shape, human cloning research paper.
A look at the history of virtually any culture reveals that man has had enough problems in the form of warfare, human cloning research paper, murders, and crime simply dealing with people created naturally. One can only wonder at how many more such complications will occur with people cloned and designed for specific human cloning research paper. It is this facet of the unnatural aspect of life that human cloning would quite literally engender which is the most troublesome, ultimately.
Cloning would give man too much power over his environment in a human cloning research paper that is far from that which he has always had in nature. These implications regarding the immense power that mankind would have -- or, more accurately, that specific members of mankind would have while cloning -- is certainly alluded to Rifkin's article.
The authors spend a good deal of time elucidating the patent history of cloning and explaining its ramifications for stem cell research. The problem with patenting cloning and aspects of stem cell development and the surplus of power it gives to companies and the nations which house them, let alone the individuals who work in the former is demonstrated in the subsequent quotation.
Secondly, should companies like Geron and Advanced Cell Technology be allowed to own -- in the form of intellectual property -- the primary human human cloning research paper that are the gateway to the entire biological composition that constitutes human life? Rifkin Works Cited Harris, John. New York: Blackwell Publishing. Rifkin, Jeremy. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy. Human Cloning The Cloning of Human Beings Cloning is the creation of an exact biological twin generated from the DNA of a donor.
In effect, a person creates an exact copy, with the exact genetic sequence, from their own DNA. While the cloning of human beings has been the realm of science fiction, the creation of sheep clones has pushed the idea of human cloning into the range of possibilities.
At present. Human Cloning The subject of human cloning was once the stuff of science fiction novels human cloning research paper television programs. As technology and science improves, the creation of clones has become, potentially, a real likelihood in the impending future. For the follow, the definition of human cloning is that which has been designated by the American Medical Association: The term "cloning" will refer to the production of genetically identical organisms via somatic cell nuclear.
Ethics of Human Cloning Two Major Types of Cloning In the epoch, numerous scientists initiated researching formulas of cloning the high order animals, particularly mammals Kassp, human cloning research paper. The heightening success of their research and experiments has resulted into pervasive discussion over the probability of human cloning. This discussion has elicited extensive disagreements within the scientific society and the entire public over whether the research of human cloning is right.
Muslim scholars agree that Allah has created a diverse and distinct world Cole-Turner, Human cloning revolves around the duplication of same genes and thus, this would have a negative impact on the diversity of creation. Furthermore, human cloning research paper, Muslim scholars question that if human cloning is allowed, then how the clone would be treated? What would be the ethical, social and moral value of the clone?
Furthermore, human cloning is. It focuses on the controversy, and provides answers to the question of whether or not stem cell research is providing the benefits in the ways in which the public believes they will soon be benefiting from the research, human cloning research paper.
The authors contend that partisan responses to the public's concerns over stem cell research are delaying the benefits of much needed treatments and cures that can be derived from stem cell research, human cloning research paper. Human Cloning Debate When Frankenstein was adapted for stage in human cloning research paper production's title was Presumption; or, human cloning research paper, The Fate of Frankenstein.
A Victorian audience was concerned with the theme of a man's ambition to replace God by creating a new species, human cloning research paper. Equal emphasis was placed on this aspect of the novel in the introduction of Frankenstein, "It is Mary Shelly's critique of where such highly abstracted creative powers can lead.
Learning Tools Study Documents Writing Guides About us FAQs Our Blog Citation Generator Flash Card Generator Login SignUp. Download this Research Paper in word format. Excerpt from Research Paper : Ethics of Human Cloning Ever since Dolly the Sheep was initially cloned in the latter portion of the 20th centurythere has been widespread debate over the ethical issues and the practicality of human cloning. Read Full Research Paper.
Human Cloning the Cloning of Human Beings Words: Length: 3 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper : Human Cloning the Subject of Human Cloning Words: Length: 8 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper : Ethics of Human Cloning Two Major Types Words: Length: 5 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper : Ethics of Human Cloning in Words: Length: 5 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper : Human Cloning and Genetic Engineering Words: Length: 3 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper : Human Cloning Debate When Frankenstein Was Adapted Words: Length: 3 Pages Topic: Children Paper :
Human cloning: Are we a step closer? - ITV News
, time: 1:30The Ethics of Human Cloning and Stem Cell Research - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
Words: Length: 8 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper #: Human Cloning The subject of human cloning was once the stuff of science fiction novels and television programs. As technology and science improves, the creation of clones has become, potentially, a real likelihood in the impending future Human cloning research paper. Thangavelu 1 Dusha Thangavelu Mrs. Heenan ENG 4U1 20 July Introduction Human cloning has been a very controversial topic for many years now. The term human cloning includes numerous methods that are used to produce genetically identical copies of humans. The human clone is the copied material, compromised of the Estimated Reading Time: 10 mins Oct 12, · All three panelists commended the decision of the state advisory committee to deal separately with the issues of human cloning and stem cell research. Religious Perspectives. Two religion panelists, Suzanne Holland and Laurie Zoloth, are co editors of The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics and Public Policy (MIT Press, ). Holland,
No comments:
Post a Comment